Natural Law Philosophy And Acts Of Civil Disobedience

The topic of this report focuses on natural law philosophy and acts of civil disobedience. Natural law assumes that humans are naturally good and that they strive to be good. Natural law imposes moral responsibility to do what is right. If something is part of the law but is not morally right, it is the duty of an individual to act upon it. When people act on something that they believe is morally right but is against the law, they are committing acts of civil disobedience, a basic principal of natural law. Positive law on the other hand supports laws of man rather than laws of nature. Supported of positive law believe that the purpose of law is to do the greatest good for the maximum amount of people. In other words, laws are enforced to ensure that individuals do what is best for society rather than themselves. One example of civil disobedience is the act of refusing government interference in homeschooling practices, as done by the Berindrakes. In order for homeschooling to be leg al, the government must be involved and be able to ensure standards are being followed. However, these people insists that they are doing God’s duty by homeschooling their children and refusing standardized testing. Another example of civil disobedience is the case of false advertising with CareNet. CareNet advertises falsely and distributes misleading medical information to manipulate society into believing what they consider is morally right. However, false advertisements are illegal. ObedienceShow MoreRelatedCivil Disobedience And The United States889 Words   |  4 Pagesimperative to understand that the United States of America was born through acts of civil disobedience. And because American freedoms are constantly in danger of being encroached on, it is also important that citizens are aware of the worth that civil disobedience can possess. Civil disobedience is when a person or people refuse to obey a demand or restriction by the state that conflicts with higher law and conscience. The act requires that the disobedient one accept whatever may be the consequenceRead MoreThe And Its Effect On Society1343 Words   |  6 Pagesaltered. In government, for example, what we perceive to be morally just is all dependent upon how the laws function. We must first understand the role of the government. Essentially, the government assumes the duty of serving the people. Those officials elected to serve are meant to represent the people. The elected are to set up laws for the community in which they serve, and are to enforce these laws. In losing sight of this basic function, there would not be an effective and fairly stable government;Read MoreThe Film A Man For All Seasons1605 Words   |  7 Pageswrestles with several themes that deal with legal issues such as hot to deal with conscientious objectors, natural law versus positive law, consequentialism versus deontology and the history of legal safeguards in the Common Law Tradition. The character of Sir Thomas Moore, a devout Catholic who sat on the Kings Council and eventually became Lord Chancellor, is a jurist who is devoted to the law of England. He performs his duties diligently and with care. He turns down attempts at bribery and rulingRead MoreThe Truth Behind Political Thought944 Words   |  4 Pagesimportance of natural equality that the rule of law adheres to. Thus creates this inconsistency ,that civil disobedience is not justified because of society s accentuation on law and order. The understanding of law and civil disobedience illustrates itself in both readings of Sophocles Antigone and Plato s Apology which suggests that they give both similar views with the existing idea of different higher authority in mind. Because of the unresolved feud between the law and civil disobedience it isRead More Is Violence in Pursuit of Happiness Justified? Essay example1173 Words   |  5 Pageshowever, they should still obey the laws. Is it to the laws of the land that command total submission or to his convictions by which he is convinced that the system is totally unjust? Therefore, how should citizens defend their liberties , without using violence or disobeying the law, if they think it’s unjust? If an individual obeys the law, he would automatically be thought of supporting the unjust system but in case he does not, he would be accused of disobeying the law. There are various controversiesRead MorePatriotism and People Who Commit Acts of Civil Disobedience Essay2107 Words   |  9 Pagesrulings that uphold sovereign immunity to the power of law enforcement to disperse Occupy Wall Street protests, it seems as if the citizens have no right to disobey laws that they know to be unjust. Yet by this measure, the heroes of the past such as the American colonists, abolitionists, women’s suffragists, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Junior, Rosa Parks, and Nelson Mandela would be little more than common criminals. All of these heroes broke the law in the name of a greater justice, and today all ofRead MoreWorld Religious Traditions By John Martin Luther King Jr.1392 Words   |  6 Pagesdifference b etween â€Å"just† and â€Å"unjust laws†. King writes, â€Å"A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law† (Michaelvdg 2010). This concept dates back to a philosophy developed by the Romans. The Roman’s code was between these two concepts, â€Å"Ius Gentium† and â€Å"Ius Naturalis†. Ius Gentium means a law that is universally practiced, where Ius Naturalis means natural law (Michaelvdg 2010). One way to explainRead MoreTranscendentalism1409 Words   |  6 Pagesof nature. In general, people still feel that society needs to better itself for the benefit of all individuals, which is at the heart of Transcendentalism. Some of the ideas that Transcendentalists constantly defended included individualism, civil disobedience, and the protection of nature. These ideas are consistently integrated with the social movements and trends that are seen in America today and in the past one hundred years. Individualism is the concept of being self-reliant and using intuitionRead MoreConflicting Moral Arguments : Louis Vaughn s Philosophy, Moral Relativism And Moral Objectivism872 Words   |  4 PagesArguments Louis Vaughn states that the purpose of morality is not to describe how things are, but to â€Å"prescribe how things should be† (2). In Philosophy, moral relativism and moral objectivism are two conflicting but somewhat overlapping school of thought. These beliefs govern the way an individual acts; they also decide the ethical guidelines from which the law is written. In this essay we will delineate the differences between the two sects of belief. Pojman asserts that many people self-report asRead MoreAnalysis Of Thomas Hobbes s Leviathan 2457 Words   |  10 Pages Laviathan, Thomas Hobbes most important work and one of the most substantial philosophical texts of the Seventeenth century, was written largely as a response to the political violence and turmoil of England’s civil wars. In Leviathan, Hobbes, using science and reason as a foundation, attempts to create a concrete and methodological solution for peace and political stability. In the context of a historically violent and fear stricken period in which Leviathan was written, it